Immigrants No Longer “Aliens”

We all know California as one of the most progressive states in the Union. Last week, the state burnished its reputation when Governor Jerry Brown signed a triptych of immigration bills, the first of which removed the word “alien” from California’s legal code because, according to the L.A. Times, “it is seen as a disparaging term for those not born in the United States.”

The second bill allows immigrant high school students to serve as election poll workers. One legislator indicated that new law in California is, “not only expanding our access to bi-lingual poll workers,” it also provid[es] high school age lawful permanent residence first-hand experience with American democracy.”
(LATIMES)

In the third bill, California made it improper to consider a child’s immigration status in determining any liability or remedy in a civil lawsuit.

See the original Los Angeles Times Story here.

Recommended Articles

article feature image
SCOTUS Resolves Circuit Split and Rejects 9th Circuit’s More Lenient Cancellation of Removal Standard

SCOTUS clarified that a legal permanent resident alien can be physically in the U.S., commit a criminal offense, and still be inadmissible.

article feature image
Former Informants Are Not Protected Group

Fifth Circuit: Former Informants Are Not Protected Group

article feature image
New Shelters for Surge of Migrant Youths Crossing Border

The Secretary of Health and Human Services has asked the Pentagon to add 5,000 more beds for young people. During last year’s surge of undocumented persons, the military opened emergency shelters to house the migrants at bases in Oxnard, San Antonio and Ft. Sill, Oklahoma.

article feature image
Deported Immigrants with Mental Disabilities

On September 26th, 2015 U.S. District Judge Dolly M. Gee granted final approval of the settlement in Franco v. Holder, paving the way for previously deported immigrants with severe mental disabilities to request to reopen their cases in Immigration Court, and if approved return to the United States.

tucson-downtown
Attorney Failed to Explain Immigration Consequences | Ninth Circuit

The defense attorney has an affirmative duty to properly advise. It is not enough to say it is a “possibility” under those circumstances.

Michael Harwin

About Michael Harwin

Michael’s skill and experience have been recognized repeatedly. He holds an A-V 5/5 preeminent rating by Martindale Hubbell. He has been named one of the top lawyers in Arizona by Southwest Superlawyers, and one of the best lawyers in Tucson by Tucson Lifestyle Magazine. He also has been named one of the best lawyers in the United States by BestofUS.com , and given the highest rating possible by AVVO, 10/10 Superb. Amazon Books