Attorney General Loretta Lynch Questioned on Syrian Refugee Screening
On Tuesday, November 17, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, in her first oversight hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, fended off hours of tough questions from Republicans who voiced skepticism that the U.S. can effectively screen prospective refugees seeking to enter the country from Syria. Lynch defended the U.S. screening process, but she conceded there can be “challenges” posed by the country’s chaotic civil war.
Critics of the refugee proposal point to FBI Director James Comey’s remarks earlier this year, when he worried that “gaps” in U.S. intelligence would make it difficult to fully screen refugees.
“There is risk associated of bringing anybody in from the outside, but specifically from a conflict zone like that,” Comey told the Senate panel.
Lynch replied, stating that U.S. screening measures go beyond using information from databases, and argued that the government’s top goal is the “the protection and safety of the American people.”
The Attorney General assured the committee that screening measures for refugees hoping to enter the U.S. are “robust,” as a slew of governors seek to block Syrian refugees from entering their states.
Furthermore, according to the U.S. News & World Report, Lynch told the House Judiciary Committee that protecting the U.S. from the threat of the Islamic State and other terrorist groups is the Justice Department’s top priority, adding that more than 70 people have been charged in the last two years for alleged conduct related to foreign-fighter activity and homegrown violent extremism.
The screening process for refugee admissions is already rigorous. A group of former security and diplomatic officials recently wrote an open letter to the Obama administration arguing that the U.S. could accept as many as 100,000 refugees. Instead, President Barack Obama has promised that the United States will admit 10,000 Syrian refugees for resettlement over the next 12 months, after criticism that America is not doing enough. See—Plan to accept Syrian refugees.
President Barack Obama responded to hardening opposition against the plan to relocate thousands of Syrian refugees by saying that “slamming the door” in the faces of refugees would be “a betrayal of our values.”
SCOTUS clarified that a legal permanent resident alien can be physically in the U.S., commit a criminal offense, and still be inadmissible.
Fifth Circuit: Former Informants Are Not Protected Group
On September 26th, 2015 U.S. District Judge Dolly M. Gee granted final approval of the settlement in Franco v. Holder, paving the way for previously deported immigrants with severe mental disabilities to request to reopen their cases in Immigration Court, and if approved return to the United States.
The defense attorney has an affirmative duty to properly advise. It is not enough to say it is a “possibility” under those circumstances.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch defended the U.S. screening process, but she conceded there can be “challenges” posed by the country’s chaotic civil war.
About Michael Harwin
Michael’s skill and experience have been recognized repeatedly. He holds an A-V 5/5 preeminent rating by Martindale Hubbell. He has been named one of the top lawyers in Arizona by Southwest Superlawyers, and one of the best lawyers in Tucson by Tucson Lifestyle Magazine. He also has been named one of the best lawyers in the United States by BestofUS.com , and given the highest rating possible by AVVO, 10/10 Superb. Amazon Books