Does Arizona Law Enforcement Use the New Clearview AI Facial Recognition App?

It is unknown whether any Arizona law enforcement agencies are using the new facial recognition technology sold by a company called Clearview AI, but since over 2200 entities are using this technology, it is highly likely it is being used here in Arizona.

In previous blogs, I have discussed how facial recognition technology is used as an investigative tool, but until recently, this technology was used by law enforcement to match surveillance video to other photos taken by or submitted to federal and state governments, such as driver’s license photos, mug shots, and immigration records. But, the New York Times recently ran a story on a new technology that can be used to compare suspect photos against a database of several billion photos gleaned from social media and other publicly available sources. The company, Clearview AI, has sold or given free trials of this technology not only to law enforcement agencies, but also private companies such as Macy’s and Walmart, as well as universities.

The Clearview face database also contains photos that have been deleted and from accounts that have been disabled, because once the photos were “scraped” from the internet, the photo is there to stay in Clearview’s database.

Legal Issues with Clearview AI’s App

Right now, there are really no laws that address what circumstances would justify law enforcement’s or a private security agency’s decision to run someone’s face through this database. There are certainly complex privacy issues implicated if, for example, all routine traffic stops included a facial scan of everyone in the car. While this technology is primarily used as an investigative tool for solving crimes and not as direct evidence, it is not hard to imagine other uses for the technology such as immigration enforcement (ICE is already using the technology) or employer background checks. Clearview admits to providing trial accounts to potential private investors and the technology is being used more broadly in other countries.

Since this story broke, some government officials and social media platforms have been scrambling to find ways to limit Clearview’s ability to operate so freely. Google, You Tube, Microsoft, and Twitter sent cease and desist letters to Clearview and multiple parties are filing lawsuits against Clearview for violating the terms of use for their sites. Apple recently disabled Clearview’s ability to further distribute their app to IOS devices, but the app can still be downloaded to Android devices. There are also potential violations of federal privacy laws protecting the privacy of children’s images online.

Legal Challenges to the Accuracy of Facial Recognition Technology Might Become More Difficult

What truly makes Clearview’s app different from prior technologies is not only the ease of accessibility, but also the accuracy it claims, compared to previously available facial recognition tools. One journalist reported that during a law enforcement demonstration, the app located seven photos of him, even when he covered his mouth and nose with his hands. Previous technologies would often return tons of “matches” that were not actually the suspect, and could only accurately match pictures taken from the front, and were therefore highly criticized for their use in investigations and not typically allowed to be used as evidence. But, Clearview’s app can reportedly, quite accurately, match faces wearing glasses, hats, from a side profile, or only a partial picture and several trial users report that the results of searches were almost 100 percent accurate. Therefore, it is not far-fetched to envision a time in the near future when facial recognition results could be given the same evidentiary weight as fingerprints and DNA.

Recommended Articles

sealed document
Sealing Records Under Arizona’s New Law

Criminal records of arrests, even where charges are dismissed, and almost all convictions, even for minor offenses, can and do follow a person for years.

indictment
Pima County Preliminary Hearings and Grand Jury Indictments Felony Criminal Procedure

A preliminary hearing is the ostensible first stop in the system of supposed checks and balances embedded in the concept of criminal prosecution and justice

man behind jail cell
You’ve Been Arrested for a Felony in Pima County: What Happens Next?

You or someone you care about was just arrested for a felony in Pima County. This article will give you an overview of what to expect

evidence
The Prosecutor Failed to Give Me Evidence: Three Things You Can Do

Three things you can do where the prosecutor has failed to timely disclose important evidence related to your case.

article feature image
Domestic Violence for Professionals – Part III – Asserting Victims’ Rights to Influence Outcome

Today we’ll talk about how victims may also influence the final outcomes of domestic violence criminal proceedings in Arizona, particularly in relation to a putative offer of “diversion.”

Michael Harwin

About Michael Harwin

Michael’s skill and experience have been recognized repeatedly. He holds an A-V 5/5 preeminent rating by Martindale Hubbell. He has been named one of the top lawyers in Arizona by Southwest Superlawyers, and one of the best lawyers in Tucson by Tucson Lifestyle Magazine. He also has been named one of the best lawyers in the United States by BestofUS.com , and given the highest rating possible by AVVO, 10/10 Superb. Amazon Books