Arizona Court of Appeals Tosses Voter Fraud Conviction

In a notable unanimous opinion Arizona Court of Appeals vacated a voter fraud conviction. State v Hannah 1CA-CR14-0424 (July 28, 2015).

There, a Mohave County Arizona Grand Jury indicted Hannah for one count of illegal voting in violation of A.R.S. § 16-1061V(2) alleging that she “voted in the November 2, 2010 general election in both Mohave County Arizona and Adams County Colorado” Id.¶ 2. At trial, the state presented evidence that on October 18 Hannah sent in a mail in Ballot to Adams, Colorado County Clerk. She then also cast a ballot in person at the polling place in Mohave County Arizona, however, no single candidate or issue appeared on both the Colorado and Arizona Ballots. Id.

The Mohave County jury convicted Hannah of the voter fraud and she appealed. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that although “the elections held in Arizona and Colorado November 2, 2010, although occurring on the same day, were separate and discrete elections, held in two different states.” Id. ¶8. As such, Hannah’s conviction was not supported by evidence and vacated.

Recommended Articles

sealed document
Sealing Records Under Arizona’s New Law

Criminal records of arrests, even where charges are dismissed, and almost all convictions, even for minor offenses, can and do follow a person for years.

Pima County Preliminary Hearings and Grand Jury Indictments Felony Criminal Procedure

A preliminary hearing is the ostensible first stop in the system of supposed checks and balances embedded in the concept of criminal prosecution and justice

man behind jail cell
You’ve Been Arrested for a Felony in Pima County: What Happens Next?

You or someone you care about was just arrested for a felony in Pima County. This article will give you an overview of what to expect

The Prosecutor Failed to Give Me Evidence: Three Things You Can Do

Three things you can do where the prosecutor has failed to timely disclose important evidence related to your case.

article feature image
Domestic Violence for Professionals – Part III – Asserting Victims’ Rights to Influence Outcome

Today we’ll talk about how victims may also influence the final outcomes of domestic violence criminal proceedings in Arizona, particularly in relation to a putative offer of “diversion.”

Michael Harwin

About Michael Harwin

Michael’s skill and experience have been recognized repeatedly. He holds an A-V 5/5 preeminent rating by Martindale Hubbell. He has been named one of the top lawyers in Arizona by Southwest Superlawyers, and one of the best lawyers in Tucson by Tucson Lifestyle Magazine. He also has been named one of the best lawyers in the United States by , and given the highest rating possible by AVVO, 10/10 Superb. Amazon Books