SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO REFERRED FOR PROSECUTION
On Friday, August 19th United States District Court Judge G. Murray Snow, Phoenix, referred for prosecution Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Chief Deputy Jerry Sheridan, Captain Steve Bailey, and Attorney Michele Iafrate.
Previously, Judge Snow had held Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and three others in contempt for disobeying orders meant to curtail racial profiling in the Sheriff’s Department.
The August 19th ruling stemmed from Melendres v. Arpaio, 784 F.3d 1254 (9th Cir. 2015), which involved a class action filed in 2007 against Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, alleging officers racially profiled latinos and unlawfully detained them during crime-suppression sweeps.
Judge Snow had originally issued a preliminary injunction as far back as 2011 prohibiting Sheriff’s deputies from illegally targeting latinos. Judge Snow issued a subsequent order in 2013, mandating that Arpaio and the Sheriff’s office take a number of specific steps to prevent future racial profiling. It was violations of that injunction primarily which triggered recent contempt & referral determinations.
For example lawyers who argued against Arpaio claimed that at least 190 people were pulled over in violation of the 2013 order to stop immigration patrols, all though they contend the number of victims is likely much higher. They also claimed that Arpaio violated the order because he wanted to look tough on immigration during a difficult election year. See Melendres v. Arpaio, 784 F.3d 1254 (9th Cir. 2015).
Although Arpaio has maintained that his violations were not willful, Judge Snow determined to the contrary that Arpaio’s contempt “was both knowing and intentional.” See Melendres v. Arpaio, 784 F.3d 1254 (9th Cir. 2015).
Moreover, Judge Snow has now determined that there is “probable cause to believe that many if not all of the statements were made in an attempt to obstruct any inquiry into their further wrong doing and negligence.”
Many times when a person is pulled over by the police in his or her automobile, the police will search the vehicle the person was driving without a warrant, and without permission. Today we will talk about warrantless vehicle searches.
Arizona’s new sealing statute is a powerful way for people who have been charged or convicted of many common offenses, to be able to say “no” in many instances.
Diversion is a recognized court procedure, common in Arizona, but that is discretionary, and controlled entirely by the prosecutor, but that when offered and completed allows you to have all criminal charges entirely dismissed
In Arizona, “Aggravated Assault” charged under ARS § 13-1204 is a Class Four Felony, and in some cases with mandatory prison.
DUI or domestic violence police misconduct even if not resulting in grievous misfortune can sometimes provide a helpful remedy for the criminally accused.
About Michael Harwin
Michael’s skill and experience have been recognized repeatedly. He holds an A-V 5/5 preeminent rating by Martindale Hubbell. He has been named one of the top lawyers in Arizona by Southwest Superlawyers, and one of the best lawyers in Tucson by Tucson Lifestyle Magazine. He also has been named one of the best lawyers in the United States by BestofUS.com , and given the highest rating possible by AVVO, 10/10 Superb. Amazon Books