New 9th Circuit Opinion: Prosecutorial Misconduct
In a notable recent decision on prosecutorial misconduct, United States v. Citali-Flores, 14-50027, 2015 WL 5569098 (9th Cir. Sept. 23, 2015), the Ninth Circuit held error, albeit harmless, where the prosecutor, in closing argument, misstated evidence.
There, Flores was indicted with importation of marijuana into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§952 and 960. See id. at 3. At trial, Flores testified that she was “carrying” and “bringing” marijuana into Mexico, not the United States, after being questioned about a Facebook message found that she wrote. Id. at 5. The prosecutor, however, argued, in closing arguments, that Flores testified she was “carrying and bringing marijuana from Mexico into the United States.” Id. at 8.
In holding that the prosecutor’s argument was improper, the Ninth Circuit emphasized that the misstated evidence invited the jury to improperly “convict the defendant based on her admission to carrying marijuana to Mexico” when exportation was not even the charge. Id. at 2.
Although the conviction was affirmed, on plain error review, Judge Wardlaw noted: “Once again, An Assistant United Sttes Attorney for the Southern District of California overstepped the boundaries of permissible questioning and argument.” Id. at 15. Moreover, Judge Pregerson, in dissent, would have likely reversed: “These serious violations do not warrant invocation of the plain error rule.”Id.at 15.
Jurisdictions all over the country are faced with cases of individuals using or threatening to use Covid-19 as a “weapon” to harm others.
Proposed reforms to Arizona’s asset forfeiture rules failed this year, despite strong support. State data shows that forfeitures fall heaviest on people who cannot afford an attorney.
The Paycheck Protection Program is supposed to protect small businesses unless, that is, the person has a felony conviction.
Most criminal matters in Tucson are temporarily continued, at least for the next few weeks, as we explain below. A couple things to keep in mind.
It is unknown whether any Arizona law enforcement agencies are using the new facial recognition technology sold by a company called Clearview AI.
About Michael Harwin
Michael’s skill and experience have been recognized repeatedly. He holds an A-V 5/5 preeminent rating by Martindale Hubbell. He has been named one of the top lawyers in Arizona by Southwest Superlawyers, and one of the best lawyers in Tucson by Tucson Lifestyle Magazine. He also has been named one of the best lawyers in the United States by BestofUS.com , and given the highest rating possible by AVVO, 10/10 Superb.